Which one is better in taking pictures, Apple or Android (domestic VIVO, OPPO, etc.)?
by Poster
May 15, 2025
37
To record children's daily life, most of them take photos and a small number of videos. Every time I see other people's topics, a bunch of people say that Android is much better than Apple's current photos. What is the strength? The feeling I took with Android was just beautified, not real. I used VIVO's built-in camera and turned off all special effects
Replies
-
Anonymous2248 May 15, 2025I use Apple to record videos for my baby, and Xiaomi 👀 to take photos
-
Anonymous12790 May 15, 20251. It is true that today's Android phones take pictures better than iPhones 2. Android uses larger Sensor and lens size to improve image quality, but the phone is thicker and heavier 3. Android phones generally have more radical algorithms, such as face detail enhancement, such as beauty algorithm, and more radical multi-frame strategy. But at the same time, it will bring obvious traces of AI, such as wrong facial features enhancement on the reflection of characters, resulting in terrible effects. (GRIMACE) 4. The camera experience of Android phones may still not catch up with iPhones. 5. When the Android phone leaves the native camera, the third-party APP is very rubbish when taking pictures. 6. The telephoto of Android phones is much better than the 5x telephoto of iPhone 16 Pro Max due to its larger physical size 7. Android phones generally have better magnification. 8. Many algorithms cannot be turned off, even if the display is turned off. 9. Good works depend more on the photographer, and the equipment can only provide the foundation of image quality. 10. The above views typed by myself on the keyboard only represent personal thoughts and are for reference only.
-
Poster May 15, 2025@ Anonymous12790 is that the camera hardware of Android generally surpasses that of iPhone, but the software is too bad?
-
Anonymous1705 May 15, 2025Apple
-
Poster May 15, 2025@ Anonymous2248 I don't want to be dual-wielding, it's okay at home, but it's too troublesome to take it with me when I go out
-
Anonymous902 May 15, 2025Photo ov, video apple
-
Anonymous114 May 15, 2025Use Android for photos and Apple for video
-
Anonymous1995 May 15, 2025Why do you ask if you have an answer? Ask yourself and answer yourself to find approval?
-
Anonymous13192 May 15, 2025Video apple. Android video vivo, Android photo video vivo, only photo oppo vivo Huawei
-
Anonymous9688 May 15, 2025It depends on how to judge the concept of taking pictures. The iPhone is strong in restoring the real look and feel of the scene. In fact, many scenes are not as beautiful as those taken by Android phones, and the iPhone is ugly. Android machines are strong in 1. Good hardware quality, larger base, higher pixels, etc. If you dig into details, Android flagship is too much ahead of iPhone; 2. Good-looking colors, or other optimizations, such as OPPO's Hasselblad colors and Xiaomi's Leica colors, are all optimized on the basis of the original film to a certain extent, which is more in line with most people's aesthetics.
-
Poster May 15, 2025@ Anonymous1995 I don't understand anything about cameras and taking pictures. I want to know where Android is strong
-
Anonymous1741 May 15, 2025Experience it and you will know
-
Anonymous2249 May 15, 2025Take pictures of vivo and beat others
-
Anonymous564 May 15, 2025Use VIVO as soon as the film is made. If the original poster needs to use VIVO. To get close to reality, use an iPhone. When buying materials for decoration, you can only use iPhone to shoot the color of tiles, and Android phones are all color-cast when shooting tiles. Merchants only recognize iPhone shots...
-
Anonymous2250 May 15, 2025If you need it, just buy the vivo flagship. Taking pictures is especially at the t0 level. Although the video recording is not as good as Apple and Samsung, it is still ahead of other Android
-
Anonymous9929 May 15, 2025@ Poster # 11 The hardware quality is strong, and the algorithm training is pleasing. It is recommended that vivo night scene is stronger than oppo, but oppo's master mode and xpan mode are good. If you shoot a baby, both of them are very good, both of them are better than fruit (please watch something)
-
Anonymous274 May 15, 2025In terms of taking pictures, the hardware and software are better than Apple's. It's not true. Maybe you turn on the portrait, and there is blur. If you don't turn on anything, it basically goes straight out without any beautification. If you think the default wide angle is too wide, you can zoom in a little bit when shooting, so that the picture you get is similar to the picture of your human eye, and it won't be unreal
-
Anonymous2251 May 15, 2025Not a camera job level. Android flagship photography and video recording are completely enough
-
Anonymous480 May 15, 2025Dual-wielding, it happens to be used by all Android Ultra stores. If it is only better than the look and feel of a single lens, Android is better than iPhone, and the shots are stylized and P-pictured. It is suitable for some basic shooting enthusiasts and can shoot many films that far exceed the level of photography. Comprehensive multi-lens color consistency, instant shooting, zoom experience, Live Photo, full-link Dolby, algorithm stability and other comprehensive experiences, iPhone is better and suitable for most ordinary people to record their lives
-
Anonymous2252 May 15, 2025vivo's photos are amazing, much better than the iPhone. Whether it is the viewfinder or the finished film, it is better than the iPhone in all aspects.