Oops, the iMac has released a new version, the appearance has not been updated, and there is no self-developed chip. Do you want to buy it?
by Poster
Aug 5, 2020
63
After many years of Win development, it has always been like a pitfall for Mac, with no portability requirements. The iMac is most suitable for home use.
It happened to be moving to a new home, new decoration and new computer immediately, but in June it was said that a new version would be released, but it was not released.
It has been released now, but the appearance has not been updated, and the self-developed chip has not been launched. In fact, it doesn't matter whether it is a self-developed chip or not. The main reason is that I don't buy it this year, and it will be the same model next year. I wipe it and I get annoyed.
Friends, give me some real advice, whether to buy it or not (now there are educational discounts to send headphones)
Or curve to save the country, buy another Mac first (second-hand iMac? Second-hand MBP + self-brought monitor?)
Do you want to buy an iMac now or not, do you want to buy it, do not buy it, do not buy it.
Replies
-
Anonymous10307 Aug 7, 2020If we don't change the appearance this year, we can only assemble a black apple.
-
Poster Aug 8, 2020@ Anonymous10307 Many people say that there are many black fruit pits. 5000 is not counted as what level of monitor can be matched with.
-
Anonymous5853 Aug 29, 2020@ Anonymous373 I feel like it shouldn't be two A14s. The full ARM ecosystem below is estimated to be iPhone, iPad Air/Mini an A14, iPad pro, MacBook is estimated to be A14X/Z? MacBook Pro starts estimating 2-4 A14X/Z, 4-8 are possible on iMac/iMac Pro.... (Of course, it doesn't mean that there are really 8 physical A14s, and the logical core is more likely. AMD's CCX design cost is well controlled, and some defects caused by the yield rate can be downgraded and then bought through software shielding)